Clouds of uncertainty are hovering over China’s airspace amidst signs of a confrontation brewing between the Chinese government and six foreign banks over state-owned airlines’ wrong-way bets on oil prices that resulted in losses, which the state wants the banks to bear.

Three of China’s leading airlines — Air China, Shanghai Airlines and China Eastern — slipped into the red after taking losses on derivatives contracts they had taken as hedge against aviation fuel price hikes. The losses came about because the airlines made market bets without hedging against prices moving the other way — because they wanted to save money on the additional fixed cost of insurance on those hedges.

But rather than pay up, as they are bound by the contract, it appears that the airlines may be allowed to walk away, leaving foreign banks to absorb the losses — or litigate and lose lucrative mainland banking licences.

The State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (Sasac), the powerful regulator that oversees state-owned enterprises (SOEs), said in a statement that it would conduct an internal investigation into the contracts that banks sold these airlines.

“The purpose of this move,” the statement said, “is to protect our own interests by resorting to legal actions in commercial activities.” Last week, China’s reputed Caijing magazine claimed that Beijing would allow the airlines to default on the derivatives contracts. It reported that Sasac had written to six foreign banks to warn them that SOEs “reserve the right to default on commodities contracts.”

It isn’t immediately clear how serious the threat is, given that the contracts between the SOEs and the foreign banks are enforceable in jurisdictions outside of mainland China, principally Hong Kong and Singapore.

But even if the threat of litigation isn’t serious, bankers are bracing for bad news in the form of requests for ‘negotiated termination’ of the derivatives contracts. As with most things about doing business in China, the choice for the banks is between yielding ground to Sasac and opening themselves up to refund claims from others whose own bets have gone the wrong way or standing their ground and losing out on goodwill and the prospect of lucrative mainland banking licences.

Chinese companies have a particularly undistinguished record when it comes to honouring their contractual obligations when prices turn against them. In the 1990s, Chinese steel mills dishonoured contracts to buy iron ore when the spot price slipped below the prices at which they had entered into a contract. Likewise, even now, buyers have refused to take delivery of steel after the price fell in recent weeks.

Clouds of uncertainty are hovering over China’s airspace amidst signs of a confrontation brewing between the Chinese government and six foreign banks over state-owned airlines’ wrong-way bets on oil prices that resulted in losses, which the state wants the banks to bear.

Three of China’s leading airlines — Air China, Shanghai Airlines and China Eastern — slipped into the red after taking losses on derivatives contracts they had taken as hedge against aviation fuel price hikes. The losses came about because the airlines made market bets without hedging against prices moving the other way — because they wanted to save money on the additional fixed cost of insurance on those hedges.

But rather than pay up, as they are bound by the contract, it appears that the airlines may be allowed to walk away, leaving foreign banks to absorb the losses — or litigate and lose lucrative mainland banking licences.

The State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (Sasac), the powerful regulator that oversees state-owned enterprises (SOEs), said in a statement that it would conduct an internal investigation into the contracts that banks sold these airlines.

“The purpose of this move,” the statement said, “is to protect our own interests by resorting to legal actions in commercial activities.” Last week, China’s reputed Caijing magazine claimed that Beijing would allow the airlines to default on the derivatives contracts. It reported that Sasac had written to six foreign banks to warn them that SOEs “reserve the right to default on commodities contracts.”

It isn’t immediately clear how serious the threat is, given that the contracts between the SOEs and the foreign banks are enforceable in jurisdictions outside of mainland China, principally Hong Kong and Singapore.

But even if the threat of litigation isn’t serious, bankers are bracing for bad news in the form of requests for ‘negotiated termination’ of the derivatives contracts. As with most things about doing business in China, the choice for the banks is between yielding ground to Sasac and opening themselves up to refund claims from others whose own bets have gone the wrong way or standing their ground and losing out on goodwill and the prospect of lucrative mainland banking licences.

Chinese companies have a particularly undistinguished record when it comes to honouring their contractual obligations when prices turn against them. In the 1990s, Chinese steel mills dishonoured contracts to buy iron ore when the spot price slipped below the prices at which they had entered into a contract. Likewise, even now, buyers have refused to take delivery of steel after the price fell in recent weeks.

Say bye bye to duplicate content.
Now, with WordPress Uniquefier v3.4 all your articles are 100% unique
What is Uniquefier and how is it going to help you?
Uniquefier is a WordPress Plugin which once activated will turn your blog content from duplicate to unique. All it takes is 1 single click to activate the plugin and everything will be 100% unique content.
You may be wondering how is this possible? Well, it is indeed, and no it’s not one of those article rewriters or any spinners you may have heard of. More, the articles will be the same for your site visitors, the changes which are being made to the articles are in the backpage, in the page source, changes which are not visible to the visitors, but only to the search engines bots and browsers. We are not adding hiding text or any kind of such activities which are strictly forbidden, the Uniquefier uses a simple, yet highly effective mechanism of turning your articles unique. It is a well known fact that search engines (for google has been proofed) can run and index non advanced JavaScript from your pages. This is why, by using a special technique we place the original articles under a JavaScript run. This way:

• you get original content as the way you show the articles is different than just a pure copy+paste
• search engines understand what an untrained human eye can’t

Click here to view more details

Tags: administration commission, Air China, airspace, aviation fuel, aviation fuel price, aviation fuel price hike, Caijing magazine, china, china airlines, China Eastern, china shanghai, Chinese government, contracts, fixed cost, foreign banks, fuel price hikes, internal investigation, leading airlines, legal actions, litigate, mainland china, oil prices, Sasac, Shanghai Airlines, shanghai china, SOE, state owned enterprises, State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission, state-owned enterprise

Related posts:

1. China opposes Dalai Lama’s Arunachal trip
2. China opposes Dalai Lama’s visit to Indian border area
3. India’s Missile Technology a Decade Behind That of China
4. How China gifted two nuke bombs to Pakistan